I hope they are combining the cameras properly though - I was following a car on the motorway yesterday that kept veering out of its lane - I have no doubt that the driver was using a phone - and probably sober.
So will it work?
Who nose?
The random musings of a middle-aged idiot on the subject of cars and motoring. A bit like Top Gear used to be.
I hope they are combining the cameras properly though - I was following a car on the motorway yesterday that kept veering out of its lane - I have no doubt that the driver was using a phone - and probably sober.
So will it work?
Who nose?
Is it better to catch criminals or to prevent crime in the first place?
Prevention is allegedly meant to be better than cure.
I suppose you are in danger of putting a lot of prison officers out of work - it may be a while before that is the issue here in the UK though.
The Australians have a bloody good idea along this theme - and it's to do with drink-driving.
Just breathalyse the drivers BEFORE they get in their cars.
According to this Auto Express story, A new law is set to bring self-driving cars to UK roads in two years and puts responsibility in the hands of manufacturers if there is an accident.
No it won't.
The article goes on to clarify...
The vehicles must “achieve a level of safety at least as high as careful and competent human drivers”.
That's not going to happen in two years.
Plus "the government says the legal culpability will be placed firmly on the manufacturer, as well as the insurance company that covers the car, with the driver not deemed a driver per se, but a user-in-charge"
So even if they could find a manufacturer happy to risk some prosecutions for causing death by dangerous driving - the insurance companies will refuse to insure such usage. Which is a shame because this law would be the get-out clause allowing me to drive to a party or pub, get somewhat inebriated, and be driven home by my own car.
The landlords of country pubs will like this law.
Mark Harper, who is our current Transport Secretary apparently, jumped on the bandwagon stating, "Britain stands at the threshold of an automotive revolution, and this new law is a milestone moment for our self-driving industry which has the potential to change the way we travel forever.”
No it doesn't.
He also turned up polluting one of my favourite Youtube channels the other being "interviewed" by Steph from idriveaclassic - I don't know if she is a bit Tory but she gave him an easy time and let him make snide comments about Labour and the London ULEZ zone without pointing out that it was Boris Johnson who introduced it and it is the government that is forcing the metropolitan councils to hit stricter air pollution target levels - not that that is a bad thing.
I was quite amused though that he and several of the anti-electric brigade commenting on the video seemed completely oblivious that he was stood next to a Rolls-Royce Phantom II that had been converted over to run on...
...ELECTRICITY!
BYD UK's commercial vehicle managing director Frank Thorpe said he "hopes" it can replace Wrightbus's New Routemaster as the default London bus.
Seems legit.
This is one of several versions of my favourite anti-drink-drive adverts:
He only got a £100 fine though.
It's one of two short motoring/Police videos today on the BBC News site.
Meanwhile, over in The States, a driver managed to get into the staff room of a New Jersey Police Station.
I can't believe how non-plussed the officers are to find him there - especially since one could have been badly hurt if they were in there at the time. He was named as John Hargreaves of Belvidere, New Jersey and is facing charges of burglary; criminal mischief; possession of a weapon for unlawful purposes; aggravated assault; harassment; and terrorism. Nice chap. The phrase "right-wing nutter" comes to mind.And he's damaged a filing cabinet with his car door.
This couldn't happen in Britain.
Because The Tories closed all of the Police Stations.
Couple of unusual crime stories from this week.
First an idiot in Northampton buys a Renault Megane, doesn't insure it, gets behind the wheel, nearly crashes into a Police vehicle and gets it impounded:
The Police Twitter feed has some great comments added including "That's an Audi not a Porsche".
There's probably some joke here involving Jehovah's Witnesses or Double-Glazing but I'm not sure what it is.
Maybe he was just unhinged?

It wouldn't be insured because it was being driven unlawfully and without permission. Will anyone be able to sue anyone? Will that bloke who played a dodgy copper in The Bill and now claims to be an injury lawyer get involved?
I deliberately spelt "Swann" wrong there to make the title better. The BBC News story is actually about England Cricketer Graeme Swann who claims to have been on the way to Asda to buy some screwdrivers to free his cat which had become trapped under the floorboards of his home. Seems a bit far-fetched to me - last time I took up floorboards they weren't screwed down so I needed a crowbar and one of those bolster chisel thingies and a hammer. And who doesn't already have screwdrivers anyway?