This sign infuriated me recently.
Or did it?
No, I don't suppose it did really. But the road layout it "helps" you with did. It's like a big square roundabout on the edge of Swansea near the waterfront development.
If you don't go there often and you don't have a sat-nav it is a bugger to negotiate it.
But it would have infuriated this man for a different reason:
His name is Matt Parker and he dislikes the representation of a football so much that he started a petition (signed by 20000 people) to get it changed. The BBC have the story here. He is a maths geek and knows that a football made up of all hexagons, like the one on the sign, could not exist. You need some pentagons.
Now I am a football fan and a maths geek. I could argue that this representation is OK because the roadsign is flat but that would be missing the point.
The Department of Transport say:
If the signs were corrected, it would only be visible close up and not from the distance at which drivers will see the sign.
The higher level of attention needed to understand the geometry could distract a driver's view away from the road for longer than necessary which could therefore increase the risk of an incident."
But what about the distraction for drivers trying to mentally recreate a sphere from hexagons and realising that there is a fundamental error on the sign?
Meanwhile, for any Americans reading this - I would like to point out that the item in the picture that you think is a football is actually a rugby ball. The football is the round item.
Here is a rugby picture for no other reason than I think it looks nice: